I have read a decree issued by a diocese, in response to the expression of "unequivocal" will no longer be considered as belonging to the religion called "Roman Catholic Apostolic Church." The decree contains statements
extremely heavy, especially when I think about the fact that when I was not able to understand nor want, and then you can not even remember, someone has forced something. I can reasonably accept the imposition of the first and last name even though, when I was a child, I regretted the fact that nobody had asked me what name I would have liked: you should fill in the Civil Code, the possibility to change the name once they come of age exceeded the age of majority, however, I wanted to change the name, but it was not so easy and did not have sufficient economic resources. I then resigned to the fact that, beyond the fantasy that you can pack about the name and / or surname of a person, have a name and a surname has a specific social function gives you, that is, an identity . Having a name and a last name is like owning a code that makes you identifiable in case someone needs to contact you. For the same reason, I can reasonably accept that they have an additional identifying mark that distinguishes you unequivocally, in case of homonymy: the tax code. It is always of codes, which are all distinctive signs of "aseptic" (and you can still change).
begin, however, not tolerate to have Italian citizenship because I believe the time has come to have a European citizenship.
I find instead, in spite of myself, to have a "nationality" of another "state": the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church. In addition, diocesan decree in which I've seen, shows the following expression: "for the Catholic Church confers the sacrament of baptism a status indelible." There is also written that its record on the registers (refer to the record of baptism) documents a historical fact , as such can not be deleted . Historian for whom and under what?
of the above statements, however, a disturbing fact, from my point of view, is not cited any source of law. They are just "opinions" of some "right-thinking"? In
stee decree, however, also cited some passages from the Code of Canon Law (CIC, Codex Iuris Canonici ), which specify what happens to those who ask simply did not want to be a Catholic
- exclusion from office of sponsor for Baptism and Confirmation (CIC, cann. 874 and 893);
- need the permission of the place for admission to the marriage canon (CIC, can. 1071);
- deprived of ecclesiastical burial in the absence of signs of repentance (CIC, can. 1184);
- exclusion from the sacraments (CIC, cann. 1331 and 915) ;
- excommunication latae sententiae .
If I find the correct and obvious exclusion from assignments "religious" and the sacraments, I do not entirely consistent The fact, however, to bring him the "mark" baptismal indelibly (even to the point of being able to marry in the Church without having to redo the baptism). It seems to me an act of violence, carried out on me with the help of my parents, not aware, I have done this! In that rite of Baptism was never heard to explain what to expect? In none (I have heard and I went to law, of course).
I am heartened by the fact of not being subject to various antics (including sightseeing in hearse), in case of death.
is excessively "excommunication," but I can understand "their" anger when her boyfriend leaves you and you do not you expect it, as you fall from the clouds, as at least send him to "'ffanculo. It must be something like this ...
The important thing is that the excommunication and Baptism "permanent" are not recognized in civil law ... I am not, however, so sure. I wonder, though, if my baptism is considered a "historical fact" only in a specific state, namely in the Vatican City, or if it is in an ideal manner, ie for a religious institution (and therefore little more than a 'review), ie the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church.
Well, no child asks to be brought into the world: it must also be on "junk" by scaricatogli chicessia? For trash, as "good" sanitary engineer whom I believe, I mean anything is not deemed necessary by its owner and then you can decide to discard it.
Since this is so, I want to:
1, the cancellation of my baptism;
2nd, to be excommunicated without necessarily having to enter the Communist Party and of course so that it can not be any extreme for a glimpse crime of slander;
2nd, I decide if I could wish to do so, let me baptized by the Catholic Church;
3 °, which ask priests to respect freedom of religion (or secular) as set out by the Italian Constitution;
4 °, someone explain to me, as I heard, where is it written that through Baptism we become subjects of the Church and that this subjection we can not leave;
5 °, although as stated above, I want to know why nobody told these parents that their children are baptized and who believe that they simply make a leap of faith and submission, where appropriate, to God
